school reports
Yes!!
We DO Have Essays On Your Topic!!
All essays listed below are $12.95
/page with SAME DAY
DELIVERY!!
Bibliography
pages are FREE!!
|
Papers On Legal Briefs
Page 9 of 13
|
|
Oyster Bay V. Occidental Chemical, et al
[ send me this paper ]
A 3 page summary of court proceedings in the case of Oyster Bay v. Occidental Chemical, et al. This case involved the institution of an expensive EPA intervention to protect the town’s ground water from contamination from a landfill that contains decades of toxic industry waste. Bibliography lists 1 sources.
Filename: khobeps.rtf
Page v. Sloan
[ send me this paper ]
A 4 page review of this case involving injury of a hotel guest that occurs as a result of incompetence on a ontractor's part. The author answers seven specific questions about this case. Bibliography lists 2 sources.
Filename: PPlwInn1.rtf
Palsgraf v. Long Island Railroad
[ send me this paper ]
A 3 page research paper that offers a case summary for Palsgraf v. The Long Island Railroad (1928). The facts of the case, history and issues are given and the rationale of the court in deciding for the defendant is discussed. Bibliography lists 2 sources.
Filename: khpvllrr.rtf
Parental Rights in Adoption
[ send me this paper ]
A 4 page research paper that summarizes the case of Quilloin v. Wallcott, 434 U.S. 246 (1978), which is considered to be a landmark case in terms of child custody and adoption and the rights of an unwed father.
Bibliography lists 5 sources.
Filename: khpra.rtf
Preliminary Case Comparison
[ send me this paper ]
A 5 page paper comparing a current and potential case to a
similar one that already has been decided by the California Supreme Court. In the current case, a
shopping center owner is concerned about her liability in an attack on a grocery tenant's customer
in the shopping center parking lot. The case of Ann M. v Pacific Plaza Shopping Center
contained similar circumstances and was decided in favor of the landowner. It is the aim in the
current case to win a similar judgment should the matter become a court issue. Bibliography lists
1 source.
Filename: KScaseComp.wps
PRIVACY ACT OF 1974: AN EXAMPLE
[ send me this paper ]
This 3-page paper provides a basic overview of the Privacy Act of 1974 in the form of a "case study" regarding a student who inadvertently sent information to a civilian he shouldn't have. Bibliography lists 1 source.
Filename: MTpriact.rtf
Privacy and Confidentiality
[ send me this paper ]
This 4 page paper discusses the concepts of privacy and confidentiality and asks if they should ever be breached; it discusses in particular the Tarasoff case. Bibliography lists 3 sources.
Filename: HVPriCon.rtf
Pure Oil v. C.L. Dukes, Case Summary
[ send me this paper ]
A 4 page case summary that lists the facts of the case, its history, the question before the court, the holding and the disposition. Bibliography lists 2 sources.
Filename: khpovd.rtf
Robinson v. California (1962)
[ send me this paper ]
A 2 page brief of the Supreme Court case in which the appellant, convicted of drug addiction based solely on the presence of apparent needle marks and a scab, challenged the Californian practice of inflicting criminal punishment for any such addiction. The Supreme Court decided that California’s interpretation and application
of the statute resulted in cruel and unusual punishment. The contested interpretation and application of the California statute was therefore in violation of the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments. No additional sources are listed.
Filename: PPlawBr1.wps
Ruiz Trial Brief
[ send me this paper ]
A 7 page trial brief asking that evidence gained in violation of the Fourth and Fifth Amendments to the Constitution of the United States be ruled inadmissible in an indictment resulting from that evidence. This is an action alleging a violation of 49 U.S.C. 46504, interference with the flight crew of a commercial aircraft; and 21 U.S.C. 844, possession of a Schedule IV controlled substance. Defendant Michael Ruiz was indicted September 17, 2003 on charges resulting from events that took place aboard Corporate Air flight 1001 on or about September 7, 2003. Mr. Ruiz now asks that certain evidence arising from the events of September 7, 2003 be excluded from evidence. This brief is filed in support of Mr. Ruiz’s Motion. No sources listed.
Filename: KSlawBrfRui.rtf
